ARI
ARI
✓ Every layer secured
FULL-STACK SECURITY REVIEW

Every layer.
One review.

Request review Scan the surface
TURNAROUND :: 1–3 DAYS
PRICING :: A FRACTION OF TRADITIONAL AUDITS
STATUS :: ACCEPTING REVIEWS▌
The problem
Just because your smart contracts were audited doesn't mean you're safe.
What was vulnerability-free yesterday may be the next big exploit today.
0%
of losses at audited protocols in one H1 2026 analysis came from code and configuration outside their audit scope.
ack3.ai H1 2026 incident research
PATTERN :: THE EXPLOITED SURFACE IS BIGGER THAN THE AUDITED SURFACE
What we review

Audits cover one layer. We cover five.

Most firms sell smart-contract audits or UI audits. Vari reviews the whole attack surface under one umbrella — objectively more coverage, one engagement.

TYPICAL SC AUDITVARI
Smart contracts✓✓
Deployment & config✗✓
Frontend / signing UI✗ separate vendor✓
Backend / API✗✓
DNS / domain✗✓
Turnaroundweeks–months1–3 days
Pricingscoped by line countfixed by tier
MECHANISM :: AI BREADTH + HUMAN JUDGMENT · EVERYTHING IN SCOPE

Most exploits cross at least two layers. Select a layer to scan.

OUTPUT :: ONE PRIORITIZED REPORT — SEVERITY, IMPACT, REMEDIATION
How we test

We don't just read your code. We try to break it.

Reading code finds the bugs a careful engineer would catch. Attackers don't read — they exploit. So every review runs offensively: we build the attack, prove it, and hand you the exact path before someone else finds it.

01 · OFFENSIVE

Penetration testing & ethical exploitation

We ethically break into your stack — contracts, signing UI, backend, DNS. Every finding is weaponized into a working proof-of-concept and confirmed, not just flagged. We penetration-test everything, by default.

02 · ADVERSARIAL ECONOMICS

Economic & MEV research

Code can be correct and still lose money by design. We model the incentives — oracle manipulation, MEV and sandwiching, liquidation and funding games, governance and reward attacks — to find the exploits that pass every unit test.

03 · SOURCE & CONFIG

Smart-contract & configuration review

Deep smart-contract review paired with the deployment reality around it — proxy and upgrade paths, ownership and multisig thresholds, module and guard config. Most losses live in the gap between audited code and shipped configuration.

METHOD :: AI BREADTH + HUMAN OFFENSIVE JUDGMENT · PROVE THE EXPLOIT, THEN CLOSE IT
Process

Lightweight by design.

STEP_01

Scope

Repos, chains, config access.

STEP_02

Confirm

Quote + start date. Clock starts at access.

STEP_03

Review

AI breadth, human judgment. 1–3 days.

STEP_04

Deliver

Prioritized report + clarification round.

STEP_05

Re-review

Optional. 30–40% of fee after fixes.

Pricing

Priced for protection, not prestige.

Priced per product — one product means its whole stack: contracts, deployment config, frontend, backend, and DNS, reviewed together. A fraction of traditional audit cost. What are you shipping?

SELECT :: PROJECT PROFILE
PER PRODUCT · ONE FULL STACK, ALL LAYERS
SOUNDS LIKE YOU IF ::

MULTIPLE PRODUCTS?

Each product is priced as its own full stack. Reviewing several together — a protocol plus its vaults, staking, and vesting apps, say — earns a reduced per-product rate. Send the whole suite and we'll return one combined quote.

RE-REVIEW AFTER FIXES :: 30–40% OF ORIGINAL FEE · NOT SURE WHICH FITS? SEND IT ANYWAY — FIXED QUOTE IN 24H, FREE

The deliverable

One report. Everything ranked.

No 90-page PDF theater. A prioritized, publicly shareable report your devs can act on the same day.

VARI // SECURITY REVIEW REPORTSAMPLE
PROJECT :: YOURPROTOCOL · SCOPE :: FULL STACK · TIER :: STANDARD
CRITICAL
1
HIGH
3
MEDIUM
5
LOW
7
INFO
4
CRITUnrestricted proxy upgrade pathfix included
HIGHOracle staleness unchecked in liquidation flowfix included
MEDDNSSEC not enabled on primary domainfix included
Severity-ordered findingsImpact, location, and a concrete fix for each.
Configuration & deployment notesRoles, proxies, init parameters.
Frontend / backend / DNS observationsThe layers audits skip.
Residual-risk summaryHonest about what a point-in-time review can't cover.
Publicly shareableStandard disclaimers included; post it anywhere.
One clarification roundYour devs ask, we answer.
Method + FAQ

Fair questions.

Q_01How does the review actually run?
Scoping and access → AI-assisted broad analysis (static, known patterns, economic and MEV surfaces) → targeted human review of business logic, configuration, and higher-risk areas → cross-layer checks (frontend ↔ contracts ↔ backend ↔ config) → prioritization by real exploitability → written findings with remediation, plus one clarification round.
Q_02Can a 1–3 day review really be thorough?
Speed isn't a compromise — for live contracts, it's the requirement. We focus on preventing exploits on deployed, existing systems, and code that's already holding funds can't sit in an audit queue for weeks — that's a window an attacker can use. So the process is engineered for speed and accuracy: AI covers the breadth in hours, and human reviewers spend the rest on what actually gets protocols drained — logic, access control, configuration, cross-layer issues. Scope locks before we start, so every hour is review.
Q_03What role does AI play? Is this an "AI audit"?
No. AI does the broad first pass. Every finding in your report has been reviewed, validated, and prioritized by a human. AI alone is not sufficient, and we don't pretend otherwise.
Q_04How does this compare to a traditional audit firm?
Traditional firms charge a premium for two things: the review, and the logo on the cover. We do the review — logic, access control, config, plus the frontend, backend, and DNS layers most audit scopes never even touch — in days, at a fraction of the price. The premium you're skipping is mostly the logo. If an investor or exchange ever demands one, buy it then: you'll walk in with a cleaner codebase, a faster audit, and a smaller bill. If they don't, you just saved the badge tax.
Q_05Where does Vari fit with traditional audits?
Wherever you need it. Run us before a traditional audit — you'll walk in cleaner and pay less. Run us between audits — your code and config have changed since the last one, and yesterday's clean report doesn't cover today's deployment. Or run us instead — many teams find full-surface coverage is what they actually needed. If an investor or exchange demands the famous logo later, buy it then. Our report is publicly shareable with standard disclaimers.
Q_06I have more than one product — how is that priced?
Each tier covers one product's full stack — its contracts, deployment config, frontend, backend, and DNS, reviewed as one surface. If you run several products (a lending protocol plus separate vault, staking, or vesting apps, each on its own domain), each is its own full-stack review at its own tier. Submit them together and you get a reduced per-product rate and a single combined quote — the whole suite priced as one engagement.
Q_07What's explicitly out of scope?
Formal verification, deep protocol-specific economic attack research requiring extensive original adversarial modeling, continuous monitoring, and any form of guarantee or insurance. A review is a point-in-time assessment.

EVERYTHING IN SCOPE. ONE FIXED PRICE.

Our team sweeps your entire stack in hours — every known exploit pattern, every misconfiguration class, every layer a traditional scope skips. And because pricing is fixed by tier — not by line count — you submit everything. No trimming files to fit a budget, no gaps where the cut corners were. The result: a top-tier security review of your whole surface, in days.

Fix what matters first_

Tell us what you're shipping. Fixed quote within 24 hours — free, no obligation.

PREFER DMS? TELEGRAM :: @va_rinder